Curriculum:

Past, Present, and Future

 
Spring Valley School, one of the schools at which the author's grandmother taught.

 


Page Contents

20th Century Roots

 Education Through the 21st Century

 A Continuum of Aspiration

 Other Pages of Interest

 Sources


I think that maybe we do not climb a mountain because it is there. We climb it because we are here.

- Jon Carroll (Running Press, 1994)

American public education has always had the goal of helping to both maintain and to recreate a healthy democracy. Individual students are helped to learn the values of American society as well as ways they can be personally successful and contribute to the success of their nation. Sometimes the emphasis has been on the economic health of the country, sometimes the political health, and sometimes the technological health of our society.

Education's Roots in the Twentieth Century

This writer's grandfather attended school during a time when most American children lived on farms. In a 1995 letter to a group of elementary children, he described going to school as he had experienced it.

...I can tell you what being a kid was like long ago in 1909 when I was your age.

I lived on a farm just at the edge of a small town called Govan, Washington. I had a big brother Dorse, and a little sister, Mary. We could walk to school, but many of the students lived 5 or 6 miles away. They had to ride in a buggy pulled by two horses. It might take them one and a half or two hours to get to school in the morning. The big brothers or sisters drove the horses. During the day the horses stayed in a barn by the school until the kids were ready to go home again. School started at 9 a.m. and was over at 4 p.m. In the winter those who came by horse and buggy would have to go home in the dark.

The school I went to only had two rooms. In one room were Kindergarten and Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4. In the other room were Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. Each room had one teacher and about 25 students. Some teachers had older kids help younger ones. In front of the room was a row of desks for recitation. When it was time for the teacher to work with my grade, we would go up to the recitation row for reading or other learning from Mr. Sickles, who was my first teacher. The other kids would be at their own desks doing their work quietly. Each grade took turns.

One of the books I remember is Black Beauty. My parents didn't read to me at home, but our teacher read to the class every morning (Lyse, 1995).

The author's grandmother, Elsie Lyse, with her students.

 

During his days in school, curriculum delivery was centered around the recitations. It was considered "...the focal center towards which all school activities converge" (The Methods Company, 1918 p200). Basically this was when the teacher used a combination of conversation, lecture, and questioning to teach new information while tying it to previous lessons and preparing students for future lessons. Its design consisted of four parts: "...the introduction, the development, the drill, and the summary" (The Methods Company, 1918 p201). Its usefulness was to impart selected knowledge from the teacher to the student, this at a time when "graded schools" were just making their presence known.

On the right is one of the schools at which Elsie Lyse taught during the early part of the 20th century.

 

The introduction of the graded school, in which students were separated by age into sequential groups or classes (know then as classification), was considered the most modern and scientific approach to education. It created a model through which children progressed in efficient steps throughout their education, which, for most children near the beginning of the twentieth century, ended before the eighth grade. In 1918 only about six percent of the children entering elementary schools in the United States reached the eighth grade (The Methods Company, 1918 p79). States published books outlining the curriculum, including content, that students were to learn in each grade. This lock-step approach to structuring education has been termed the factory model of schooling. This design brought with it more than the arrangement of students around an age-based curriculum.

This approach was characterized by top-down management in which the administration designed, monitored and inspected work, rather than relying on the knowledge and abilities of the people doing the work. As a result, teachers made decisions based on rules and procedures found in textbooks and curriculum guides, on tests, and in grading and promotion policies. These guidelines were developed and handed down by others rather than based on the teacher's own understanding of learning and teaching strategies appropriate for diverse learners (Pepper and Rowland, 2000).

Throughout this country's industrial period, a time in which the majority of working adults held blue collar jobs, the factory model of education worked relatively well. It helped maintain the health of our democracy, in general providing students with the skills and values necessary for success in the society of that age. It must be noted that during this time, from the beginning of the century through its middle, more and more children attended and completed higher levels of education than ever before.

back to top

Education through the Twenty-first Century

As our nation has moved out of its industrial age, new skills become important for individual success as well as for our nation's economic and technological health. This transitional period has of course found its reflection in the educational arena. Pressure from the economic sector as well as the political sector has been brought to bear on educators. The cry is for higher standards, perhaps what is really meant is different standards.

Blue collar jobs that the majority of people once held will make up only 10 percent of total employment, and the jobs that are replacing them require levels of knowledge and skill previously taught to only a few students. The education challenge facing the United States is not that its schools are not as good as they once were. It is that schools must help a larger number of young people reach levels of skill and competence once thought to be within the reach of only a few (Pepper and Rowland, 2000).

Curriculum is currently changing as we pass through this age of transition. The aspect of educational life that is reflective of society is being asked to catch up with what is current. The aspect of education that is a driver of society is being drawn along by representatives through the use of standards and high-stakes testing. As this happens, the curriculum, the structure of schooling, and the role of the teacher goes through a process of change.

As always, students will need to gain the ability to think, to use knowledge they have acquired to solve problems, and to attain a level of wisdom appropriate for their maturity. Although memorizing the multiplication tables will likely never go out of style, the emphasis of curriculum will move away from factual knowledge to conceptual understanding and to skills needed to locate and use knowledge for any variety of purposes.

The structure of public education will also change. In 1928 it was recognized "...that at least a certain part of every child's day in school should be given over to the child's own plans and purposes, and that an opportunity should be made in this period for help in carrying out such plans and purposes" (Moore, Betzner, and Lewis, 1927-28 p10). In the twenty-first century, after education has moved through our present transition, the barriers to individual pacing for students will be lifted. Students' "own plans and purposes" will again be important within the framework of educational road maps (where our current standards will lead us toward). Technology's promise of open communication and dialogue will help to decentralize our districts' schools. Virtual classrooms will allow small groups of students access to courses that may be initiated from anywhere in the world. This is already being done with both public and private programs such as: Internet Academy based in Federal Way, Washington; E-school! International Inc. based in Iowa City, Iowa; CyberSchool from Eugene, Oregon; Florida High School, a statewide online school operated by school districts in Orange and Alachua counties; and Willoway CyberSchool in Reinholds, Pennsylvania (Zehr, 1999). The move over the past fifty years to centralize students into ever larger schools in order to efficiently and economically offer more classes will no longer be an issue. Schools will once again be community or neighborhood based geographically and physically being comprised of much smaller student bodies, thus supporting closer connections between students and adults.

Teachers in this new structure will still be important, their job description will simply change. A recent Public Agenda poll asked, "What is the most important thing public schools need in order to help students learn?" The top response by far was "good teachers" (Pepper and Rowland, 2000). What the people polled in this survey meant by "good teachers" varied, however it might be summed up as follows: knowledgeable managers of students, ideas, and learning experiences that help develop compassionate links between all of these elements.

In the future the teacher may lose much of the student management aspect of the job, at least in the way we currently view it. Students will not be limited by age or geographical location to learning opportunities, instead they will likely be engaged in small fluid learning groups organized around specific educational needs or interests. The learning experiences that best match their group will be available through the use of technology, a technology that will seem as invisible as a pencil is today, it will simply be a tool of learning.

back to top

A Continuum of Aspiration

In 1959 West Virginia Governor Cecil H. Underwood submitted his predictions for the future of education to the NEA. These were placed in a time capsule that was opened 50 years later. His predictions for the dawn of the twenty-first century sound similar to those many educators now foresee for the future of the mid-twenty-first century.

...the erosion of "rigid schedules, formal classes, and arbitrary norms and standards of pupil achievement." He painted a picture of a world of seemingly unlimited human knowledge, which students would be helped to explore rather than digest, the goal being "the pursuit of truth-not its capture."

And although he couldn't have had the Internet in mind, Mr. Underwood wrote that the "barriers to communication-which, in a direct way, affect the educational opportunity of many of our people," would by 1999 be reduced to "insignificance" by technology (Archer, 1999).

From his viewpoint at the beginning of the twenty-first century, Education Secretary Riley is making similar predictions. He stated in his Seventh Annual State of American Education Address that "In the 21st century, public education will be different. Education will be more individualized yet more community based. Public education will be less about a fixed location and fixed schedule, and much more about learning anytime and anywhere. Technology or E-learning will penetrate every aspect of American education and change it." He continues, "In the future, schools will be more fluid, teachers more adaptable and flexible, and students will be more accountable as the task of learning becomes theirs" (Riley, 2000).

Secretary Riley seems to build on Governor Underwood's predictions, in many ways echoing his hopes fifty years later. Perhaps we will one day reach this idyllic state of education, however, in the meantime we must make the most of our journey. As T. S. Eliot has written, "The journey not the arrival matters" (Running Press, 1994).

back to top

Other Pages of Interest

  • This author has written a paper titled Curriculum for the 21st Century. It discusses curriculum as it might look like during the transitional phase as discussed above. Included is a sample lesson plan as well as a discussion on staff training for curriculum changes.

back to top

Sources:

All sources used in creating this website are cited on the Bibliography and Sources webpage. Also note that in-text citations used above are linked directly to the appropriate portion of the Bibliography and Sources webpage.

back to top


Russell Yates - Resume

 Professional Portfolio

 Email

graywolf@olympus.net

Curriculum Topics

Curriculum Overview

 You are here: Curriculum: Past, Present, & Future

Curriculum Standards

Developmental Trends

Sample Units of Instruction


copyright © 2000 by Russell Yates